Main Session
Sep 27
PQA 01 - Gastrointestinal Cancer and Central Nervous System

2171 - Impact of Tumor Length on Locoregional Control following Radical Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

03:00pm - 04:00pm ET
Poster Hall - Exhibit Hall A
Screen: 24
POSTER

Presenter(s)

Radhika Patoriya, MD - Kiran Multi Super Speciality Hospital, Surat, Surat, Gujarat

R. Patoriya1, P. Agarwal1, B. Pumbhadia2, and K. Bhati3; 1Kiran Multi Super Speciality Hospital, Surat, India, 2Government Medical College, Surat, India, 3Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Purpose/Objective(s): Tumor length is commonly considered a surrogate for tumor burden in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and is often perceived to predict inferior outcomes after definitive chemoradiotherapy. However, contemporary real-world evidence in the era of conformal radiotherapy remains limited. We sought to evaluate the impact of baseline tumor length on locoregional control following radical VMAT-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Patients were stratified using clinically relevant 6-cm and 8-cm thresholds. The primary objective was to determine whether increasing tumor length independently predicts locoregional failure.

Materials/Methods: This retrospective real-world study included patients with locally advanced esophageal SCC treated between 2018 and May 2025 at a tertiary center. Median age was 59 years, and median tumor length was 6.6 cm (range, 2.5–11). Radiotherapy was delivered using VMAT to a median dose of 59Gy (range, 50.4–64Gy) with concurrent paclitaxel–carboplatin. The same cohort was analyzed using two tumor-length thresholds (6 and 8 cm). Patients were stratified as <6 cm vs =6 cm and <8 cm vs =8 cm. Primary endpoint was LRC; toxicities were graded per CTCAE.

Results: Eighty-one patients were analyzed with median follow-up of 12 months (range, 6–60). For tumors <6 cm, LRC was achieved in 21/41 patients (51.2%) versus 23/40 (57.5%) for =6 cm. Using an 8-cm cutoff, LRC was observed in 32/60 patients (53.3%) with <8 cm tumors and 13/21 (61.9%) with =8 cm tumors. Among patients with LRC, primary tumor location was upper esophagus in 19, middle in 6, lower in 5, and 2 had skip nodal metastases. Acute grade-2 esophagitis occurred in ~80% of patients. Hematologic toxicities were common and mostly low-grade, and treatment compliance remained acceptable.

Conclusion: In this real-world cohort of esophageal SCC treated with VMAT-based radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy, tumor length did not adversely impact locoregional control, even in patients with tumors =6 cm and =8 cm. These findings support the use of curative-intent radical CTRT in patients with large tumor burden and reinforce that tumor length alone should not preclude definitive treatment. Further analysis of distant failures and overall survival is planned.

Table: Locoregional Control by Tumor Length

Tumor Length

Total (n)

LRC Present n (%)

LRC Absent n (%)

<6 cm

41

21 (51.2)

20 (48.8)

=6 cm

40

23 (57.5)

17 (42.5)

<8 cm

60

32 (53.3)

28 (46.7)

=8 cm

21

13 (61.9)

8 (38.1)