2023 - Outcomes of =5 vs. >5 Fraction Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Presenter(s)
R. Laoprasert1, D. Burner1, J. J. Qazi1, D. Niedzwiecki2, Z. Wan2, S. J. Stephens1, M. Palta1, and C. Eyler1; 1Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Durham, NC, 2Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Purpose/Objective(s):
Hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) has emerged as an effective local treatment modality for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Comparisons between different fractionation schemes are limited in the literature. In this retrospective cohort study, we compare single-institution outcomes among HCC patients treated with hypofractionated radiation therapy in =5 fractions versus >5 fractions.
Materials/Methods:
Clinical, demographic, treatment, laboratory, and imaging data for patients with HCC treated with an initial course of hypofractionated RT were manually abstracted into a REDCap database. Regimens >5 fractions were chosen by the treating clinicians when there was concern about meeting normal tissue constraints. Time-to-event endpoints were defined from the RT start date. Freedom from in-field liver progression (FFLP) was defined as time to documented in-field progression or last imaging, with censoring at liver transplant when applicable. Time to hepatic function decline was defined as freedom from =2-point increase in Child-Pugh score (CP2). Kaplan–Meier methods were used to estimate survival, and comparisons between fractionation groups were performed using the Log Rank test.
Results:
Conclusion:
Hypofractionated RT delivered in 6-10 fractions had in-field control and preservation of hepatic function comparable to =5 fraction regimens. Either approach may represent an effective definitive treatment strategy for appropriately selected patients with HCC.