Main Session
Sep
27
PQA 01 - Gastrointestinal Cancer and Central Nervous System
2131 - Risk-Adapted Target Volume Design in FBCT-Guided Adaptive Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer:Clinical Safety, Dosimetric and Spatial Analysis
Presenter(s)
Shuyan Li, PhD - Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, Shanghai
S. Li1, W. Qi1, X. Wu2, Y. Wang2, F. Wang1, L. Yao1, M. Wang1, and S. Zhao1; 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China, 2Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China
Purpose/Objective(s):
Pancreatic SBRT is clinically constrained by radiosensitive gastrointestinal (GI) organs and significant inter-fraction anatomical shifts. This study evaluates fan-beam CT (FBCT)-guided adaptive radiotherapy (ART) using a precision risk-adapted target volume design to enable safe dose escalation while minimizing dose to the stomach and duodenum.Materials/Methods:
Twelve patients with pancreatic cancer (primary, postoperative recurrent, or oligometastatic) with tumors located in the pancreatic head or nearby regions were analyzed. All received FBCT-guided SBRT (35Gy/5Fx). A risk-adapted strategy was implemented: 1) GTV40Gy: tumor core with a 0.5 mm safety buffer away from OARs; 2) PTV35Gy: target excluding a 0.2 mm avoidance zone around OARs; 3) PTV27Gy: 5mm isotropic expansion from GTV. Daily ART plans were compared to IGRT plans using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P<0.05). Target D95%, Dmean, Dmax and OAR Dmax, V20Gy were analyzed. Spatial analysis included centroid displacement and Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC). Acute toxicities were assessed via CTCAE v5.0.Results:
FBCT-guided ART demonstrated significant dosimetric advantages. For target, ART improved coverage and reduced deviation: D95% for GTV40Gy was 39.9±0.7Gy vs. 36.9±5.7Gy (P<0.001), PTV35Gy was 34.9±0.9Gy vs. 30.1±7.0Gy (P<0.001), and PTV27Gy was 31.5±3.0Gy vs. 28.6±7.2Gy (P<0.001). Regarding OAR sparing, ART significantly reduced Dmax and volumetric doses; duodenal V20Gy was 3.23±4.14cc (ART) vs 4.31±5.9cc (IGRT, P<0.001), with similar reductions in stomach, small intestine, and colon Dmax. Regarding safety, 4 patients experienced Grade 1 acute toxicity, including nausea (n=4) and vomiting (n=2); no Grade=2 toxicities were observed. Spatial analysis revealed the cephalocaudal (CC) as the dominant displacement axis, with average CC shifts of 9.8±38.3mm (stomach) and 7.9±22.1mm (duodenum). Mean 3D vector displacement reached 28.7±32.4 mm (stomach) and 20.2±18.8mm (duodenum). Low mean DSCs (0.62 for stomach, 0.53 for duodenum) quantified substantial inter-fraction deformation.Conclusion:
For complex pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions, risk-adapted ART successfully navigates the narrow therapeutic window. By utilizing precision avoidance buffers (0.2mm for PTV35Gy and 0.5mm for GTV40Gy), this approach ensures robust dose escalation while addressing substantial CC-dominant spatial variations. The favorable acute toxicity profile and improved dosimetry support FBCT-guided ART as a safe, effective strategy for maximizing therapeutic intensity in pancreatic SBRT.