2439 - A Novel Imaging Biomarker for Radiation Induced Cardiotoxicity
Presenter(s)
A. Modiri1, I. Vogelius2, C. Terrones Campos3, D. Kutnar4, A. Sawant1, and J. Petersen2; 1University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 2Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, 4Dept. Of Oncology Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Purpose/Objective(s):
Cardiotoxicity is the second major cause of death after the cancer itself among thoracic cancer patients receiving radiotherapy (RT). Unfortunately, there are no reliable non-invasive biomarkers to predict RT-induced cardiotoxicity. In cardiology, the pericardium sac is considered a fast responder to cardiac injury. Any decline in pericardium health can potentially be an early biomarker of a later cardiac event. We investigated if RT-induced radiographic pericardium changes might serve as early imaging biomarkers for late cardiotoxicity.Materials/Methods:
We performed a retrospective study of 521 patients, 234 males & 287 females, age: 28 to 93 (median 68) yrs, treated with chemo-RT for small/non-small-cell lung cancer at 1 institution within 2009-2020. Median for mean heart doses was 2.8 Gy (max: 36.4 Gy). The heart and its 4-millimeter outmost layer (pericardium sac) were contoured on standard-of-care (Pre-RT) baseline/plan CT scans. The 5-to-8-month post-RT follow-up CTs were deformably registered on the baseline CTs using Plastimatch. The overall HU change histogram was studied and voxel-based mass change (VCM) in each dose range and tissue composition HU range was reported as average normalized value: VCMDose & HU range = mean{S? ? Dose & HU range(HUbaseline(?)-HUfollowup(?)) × Volume? } / mean{S? ? Dose range(HUbaseline(?) + 1000) × Volume? } where ? is a pericardium voxel. The CTs had mixed contrast status. To approximate a contrast calibration factor for each tissue composition HU range (CCFHU range), we used contrast-enhanced baseline and follow-up CTs from 281 patients. For each HU range, we assumed that in the absence of dose (i.e., in voxels with <1Gy) VCM was the effect of contrast: CCFHU range.Results:
The table below shows that voxels within calcification and fat HU ranges had baseline-to-followup mass changes consistent with the dose increase (p values < 0.02). When studying the 281 cases with contrast enhanced baseline and follow-up CTs, there was a dose-dependent baseline-to-followup (max: 2.6 gr) increase in overall pericardium mass (p=0.006). Additionally, the histograms of HUbaseline-HUfollowup per patient had skewed distributions with mean & skewness that were correlated (p values<0.04) with mean dose to pericardium sac (Spearman correlation factor [SCF] -0.7 & 0.7, respectively) & mean dose to the whole heart (SCF -0.6 and 0.6, respectively).Conclusion:
Pericardium HU histogram and composition distribution have dose-dependent changes at around 6 months post-RT. These changes are detectable on the standard-of-care CTs and can potentially serve as early markers of late cardiotoxicity. Table 1Dose response | (VCM – CCF) % Per pericardium voxel dose range | ||||
Tissue (HU range) | <1 (Gy) | 1-5 (Gy) | 5-10 (Gy) | 10-20 (Gy) | >20 (Gy) |
Fat (-500<HU<-10) | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.06 | -0.11 | -0.16 |
Effusion (-5<HU< 30) | 0.25 | 0.11 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.16 |
Normal tissue (31<HU<60) | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.22 |
Fibrosis (65<HU<120) | -0.02 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.19 |
Calcification (500>HU>130) | 0.11 | -0.02 | -0.14 | -0.36 | -0.90 |