2518 - Induction Immunochemotherapy followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
Presenter(s)
L. T. Yang1, D. Liu1, Z. Liu2, S. Ren3, J. Ni3, and Y. Xu1; 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China, 2Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China, 3Department of Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
Purpose/Objective(s): Immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy all play significant roles in the management of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Combining radiotherapy with chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy shows promise for limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC), offering good tolerability and survival benefits. However, there is limited data on whether immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy for LS-SCLC can be performed before chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, we investigated the safety and effectiveness of induction immunochemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with LS-SCLC, aiming to contribute new insights to the treatment of SCLC.
Materials/Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 138 patients with LS-SCLC who received chemoradiotherapy between January 2019 and December 2024. This study included 34 patients receiving induction immunochemotherapy and 104 patients receiving induction chemotherapy. All patients underwent 2-4 cycles of induction therapy before CCRT. Clinical outcomes, including survival and toxicity, were compared between the two groups. Imaging assessments were performed before and 1 month after radiotherapy. The evaluations included the tumor response to induction therapy, treatment-related adverse events, complications during and after CCRT, tumor response after CCRT, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Follow-up data were collected through regular check-ups or inpatient records. If unavailable, patients were contacted by phone.
Results: Compared to the induction chemotherapy group, the objective response rate (ORR) of tumors after induction treatment in the induction immunochemotherapy group was 67.6% (23/34) vs 45.2% (47/104) (P = 0.023). After CCRT, the ORR in two groups was 79.4% (27/34) versus 60.6% (63/104) (P = 0.045). The median follow-up time was 25.3 months for the induction immunochemotherapy group and 28.2 months for the induction chemotherapy group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for two groups was 21.3 months vs 13.1 months (P = 0.015), and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached vs 41.7 months (P = 0.039). Treatment-related toxicities of grade 1-2 were 64.7% vs 54.8% (P = 0.311), and grade 3-4 toxicities were 41.2% vs 41.3% (P = 0.986). No grade 5 treatment-related toxicities were observed in either group.
Conclusion: Induction immunochemotherapy followed by CCRT for patients with LS-SCLC is effective and safe with a high ORR, PFS and OS rate, as well as a tolerable toxicity profile. Larger, randomized controlled trials are required to confirm our findings.
Abstract 2518 - Table 1Characteristics | Induction immunochemotherapy (n=34) | Induction chemotherapy (n=104) |
Best response to induction therapy-n(%) | ||
CR/PR SD PD | 23 (67.6) 10 (29.4) 1 (2.9) | 47 (45.2) 53 (51.0) 4 (3.8) |
Best response to CCRT-n(%) | ||
CR/PR SD PD | 27 (79.4) 6 (17.6) 1 (2.9) | 63 (60.6) 34 (32.7) 7 (6.7) |
The median progression-free survival-months | 21.3 | 13.1 |
The median overall survival-months | NR | 41.7 |