2336 - Smaller Radial Margins in Superficial Radiotherapy Patients Using Reflectance Confocal Microscopy
Presenter(s)
L. Gonzalez1, S. Yarlagadda1, and N. S. Kalman1,2; 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, 2Department of Oncological Sciences, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL
Purpose/Objective(s):
Materials/Methods:
We conducted a retrospective analysis of skin cancer patients who received SRT and evaluated the difference in treatment margin and outcomes between patients who underwent RCM mapping pre-treatment versus those who did not. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the disease and treatment-related variables. Group comparisons were performed using an independent-samples t-test. Equality of variances was assessed using Levene’s test; when unequal variances were detected, Welch’s t-test was applied. A two-sided p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Kaplan-Meir survival analysis was used to compute local failure free survival (LFFS).
Results:
The cohort included 98 lesions in 62 patients. Mean patient age was 77 years (range [R]: 53-102 years), majority were male (63%), and basal cell carcinoma was the most common type (48 [77.4%]), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (11 [17.7%]) and Kaposi sarcoma (3 [4.8%]). Nose was the most common site (48 [49%]), followed by other sites on face (22 [22.4%]) and extremity (16 [16.3%]). 83 were primary lesions, while 15 were recurrent; 67 were cT1, 8 were cT2. Most common dose schedule was 40 Gy in 8 fractions (68.4%). 53 lesions had RCM mapping, while 45 lesions did not. The median lesion size in standard margin group was 1 cm (R: 0.30-3.5 cm) compared to 1.5 cm (R: 0.5-3.5 cm) in the RCM group (p=0.001). The median radial margin size in the standard group was 7.5 mm (R: 5-15 mm) compared to 5 mm (R: 2.5-10 mm) in RCM group (p=0.001). No significant difference in RT field size was observed between the groups (p = 0.99), likely due to larger lesions in RCM group. Overall, 3 lesions had local failure in 2 patients, both of whom had Kaposi sarcoma. Overall mean LFFS was 27.5 months; this was 27.9 months (95% CI: 23.4-33.4 months) in the RCM group and 20.9 months (95% CI: 18.8-22.9 months) in the standard group (p=0.55).
Conclusion:
RCM enabled reduced radial margins in patients receiving SRT without reduction in local control. These findings will be confirmed with larger patient numbers and longer follow up.