Main Session
Sep 29
PQA 04 - Gynecological Cancer, Head and Neck Cancer

2891 - A Multi-Omics Model Predicting Acute Hematologic Toxicity (HT) in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Undergoing External-Beam Radiotherapy

10:45am - 12:00pm PT
Hall F
Screen: 8
POSTER

Presenter(s)

Xin Yang, PhD - State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou,

H. Zhang1,2, W. Zheng3, Y. Li1, X. Yang4, W. Ye4, T. Song2, and S. Huang1; 1Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 2Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Theater Air Force Hospital of the People’s Liberation Army, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 4Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, GuangZhou, GuangDong, China

Purpose/Objective(s): To develop a multi-omics model integrating clinical, dosimetric, and radiomic features to predict acute hematologic toxicity (HT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) undergoing external-beam radiotherapy.

Materials/Methods: 187 LACC patients with definitive chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively studied. Acute HT was graded weekly by CTCAE 5.0. Clinical factors were BMI, FIGO stage, and chemotherapy status. Dosimetric features were dose of pelvic bone marrow (BM), including 2D dose (V10-40Gy, mean dose). Radiomic features were extracted from the BM on plan CT. 7 predictive models were: (1) Clinical, (2) Dosimetric, (3) Radiomic, (4) Clinical-Dosimetric, (5) Dosimetric-Radiomic, (6) Clinical-Radiomic, and (7) Multi-Omics (integrating all features). 4 machine learning —Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression(LR), Naive Bayes(NB), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—were evaluated. Model performance was assessed using Area Under Curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

Results: Of 187 patients, 100 met inclusion criteria after excluding incomplete datasets. Patients with grade =3 was 49%. 6 Dosimetric features selected from 5174 features and 5 radiomic features selected from 1326 features by Pearson Correlation Analysis and Random Forest Importance Ranking. Compared to the combination of two-omics and one-omic models, the multi-omics predictive model demonstrates the best AUC (RF: 0.982, LR: 0.894, NB: 0.847, SVM: 0.819), the same as the best accuracy, sensitivity,specificity for all the 4 ML algorithms. Details can be found in Table 1.

Conclusion: It concluded that multi-omics models possess the best predictive capabilities compared to traditional models.

Abstract 2891 - Table 1: Performance of models among the 4 ML

Model

RF

LR

NB

SVM

AUC

Clinical

0.829

0.798

0.751

0.698

Dosimetric

0.9

0.819

0,686

0.733

Radiomic

0.866

0.789

0.729

0.689

Dosimetric-Radiomic

0.931

0.857

0.724

0.754

Clinical+Dosiomic

0.942

0.862

0.820

0.739

Clinical+Radiomic

0.969

0.824

0.811

0.759

Multi-Omics

0.982

0.894

0.847

0.819

accuracy

Clinical

0.557

0.571

0.414

0.529

Dosimetric

0.671

0.514

0.4

0.414

Radiomic

0.629

0.571

0.414

0.414

Dosimetric-Radiomic

0.714

0.557

0.414

0.414

Clinical+Dosiomic

0.814

0.557

0.543

0.529

Clinical+Radiomic

0.829

0.514

0.486

0.577

Multi-Omics

0.871

0.6

0.571

0.6

sensitivity

Clinical

0.433

0.571

0.414

0.529

Dosimetric

0.671

0.514

0.4

0.414

Radiomic

0.629

0.571

0.414

0.414

Dosimetric-Radiomic

0.714

0.557

0.414

0.414

Clinical-Dosimetric

0.814

0.557

0.543

0.529

Clinical-Radiomic

0.829

0.514

0.486

0.577

Multi-Omics

0.871

0.6

0.571

0.6

specificity

Clinical

0.433

0.594

0.188

0.521

Dosimetric

0.535

0.465

0.46

0.172

Radiomic

0.495

0.65

0.172

0.172

Dosimetric-Radiomic

0.658

0.559

0.43

0.172

Clinical-Dosimetric

0.722

0.558

0.586

0.54

Clinical-Radiomic

0.855

0.522

0.236

0.565

Multi-Omics

0.891

0.592

0.614

0.573