Main Session
Sep 28
PQA 04 - Breast Cancer, Patient Reported Outcomes/QoL/Survivorship, Functional Radiation Medicine, Hematologic Malignancies, Palliative Care, and International/Global Oncology

2765 - Longitudinal Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life and Hope in Radiation Oncology Patients

03:00pm - 04:00pm ET
Poster Hall - Exhibit Hall A
Screen: 28
POSTER

Presenter(s)

Katherine Jin, BA - Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

K. S. Jin1, D. J. Wu1, S. Jackson1, V. Qu2, T. Kollipara3, and E. L. Pollom1; 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 2University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 3University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

Purpose/Objective(s): Radiation can significantly affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL), yet longitudinal data through treatment are limited. Hope has been established as a predictor of HRQoL. We examined longitudinal HRQoL changes following radiotherapy and whether baseline hope is associated with post-treatment HRQoL trajectories.

Materials/Methods: Patients seen in radiation oncology clinic between October 2022 and February 2025 completed the EuroQol five-dimension five-level (EQ-5D-5L) and Adult Hope Scale (AHS). The EQ-5D-5L assesses HRQoL across five domains of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression (scored 1-5, lower is better), and includes a self-rated visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best imaginable health). A composite time trade-off (cTTO) utility index was calculated using US population preference weights (Pickard et al., Value Health 2019), where 1.0 indicates perfect health and =0 a state equivalent to death. The AHS is a 12-item scale with pathway and agency subscales (eight-point Likert, higher is greater hope). Timepoints were categorized as baseline (pre-radiation), acute (0–3 months post-radiation), early (3–6 months), and late (6+ months). Linear mixed-effects models evaluated longitudinal changes in cTTO, VAS, domain scores, and hope. A linear model assessed the effect of pre-XRT agency and pathway scores on CTTO at 0-3 months, adjusting for baseline cTTO. Correlations between scores at various times points were also calculated.

Results: A total of 45 patients with =3 survey timepoints were included. 35.6% were female-identifying, median age was 63.1 years (IQR 53.5, 73.5). At 0-3 months post-radiation, anxiety-depression EQ-5D-5L subscores decreased significantly compared to baseline (estimated difference = -0.36, p = 0.007), and VAS scores improved significantly at 0-3 months post-radiation (estimated difference = 11.2, p = 0.004). cTTO and hope remained stable with no statistically significant changes from baseline observed across post-radiation timepoints. Baseline hope was strongly correlated with cTTO scores 0-3 months post-radiation (r = 0.59), with this association attenuating over time (3-6 months: r = 0.32; 6+ months: r = 0.12). After adjusting for baseline cTTO, there was no effect of pre-XRT pathway or agency score on 0-3 month cTTO.

Conclusion: While there were no significant changes in HRQoL or hope within and after six months of radiation treatment, anxiety and depression improved significantly in the acute post-radiation window. Baseline hope was strongly correlated with pre-treatment and acute post-treatment HRQoL, indicating that patients with higher baseline hope had greater HRQoL acutely after radiation. These findings highlight pre-treatment hope as a potential predictor of near-term post-radiation HRQoL and a possible target for supportive care interventions.