Main Session
Sep 29
PQA 05 - Physics

2988 - A Data-Driven Quality Assurance for Auto-Segmentation Model Updates Using a Localized Anisotropic Margin Metric

12:30pm - 01:45pm ET
Poster Hall - Exhibit Hall A
Screen: 9
POSTER

Presenter(s)

Jingwei Duan, PhD - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

J. Duan1, R. Barati1, Y. Zhao2, S. Gao2, L. E. Court2, J. D. Ohrt2, P. Balter2, L. Zhu3, Y. Rong3, X. Feng4, Q. Chen3, and J. Yang2; 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 2Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 4Carina Medical LLC, Lexington, KY

Purpose/Objective(s): Auto-segmentation models require periodic updates, yet commonly used overlap metrics (e.g., DSC) can miss clinically meaningful localized boundary errors and are confounded by organ size. We propose a novel approach using baseline data to establish anisotropic variations, enabling a robust, automated non-inferiority test for model updates.

Materials/Methods: The clinical baseline model was commissioned using 36 patients (male pelvis and head-and-neck) with 21 types of OAR. The performance of established baseline model was quantified by the anisotropic surface deviations from reference contours using deformable point cloud registration- BLD (DPCR-BLD). Anisotropic safety variation was defined at each point under a Gaussian assumption (µ±2s, 95% interval) of baseline model to reference deviations across the cohort. This established a point-specific Anisotropic Surface Dice Similarity Coefficient (Ani-SDSC) threshold reflecting commissioned standards. The deviation of updated model from the baseline model was subsequently evaluated against these point-wise anisotropic variations.

Results: Ani-SDSC better highlighted localized errors and was less organ dependent. For small OARs with consistent contouring patterns (e.g., lens and cochleae), Ani-SDSC remained high while standard metrics varied with organ size. Physicist performed qualitative review for OARs showing statistically significant differences on paired t-tests: Structures flagged by DSC (Bone_Mandible, Cochlea_R, Eye_R, and SpinalCord) were judged to have similar performances between models, while structures flagged by Ani-SDSC but not by DSC (Femur_Head_L and Femur_Head_R) were attributed to over-contouring superiorly in the new model. Glnd_submand_L was also flagged by Ani-SDSC, but was deemed similar, as the difference was driven by one outlier where the baseline model mistakenly included bolus, lowering its Ani-SDSC.

Conclusion: A degrade in Ani-SDSC warrants an expert review of model changes. This data-driven approach ensures that auto-segmentation updates meet rigorous safety standards prior to deployment, effectively mitigating the risk of localized performance regression.

Table 1. Comparison of DSC and Ani-SDSC for the evaluated OARs. * indicates p < 0.05 (paired t-test). OARs without significant differences are omitted due to word limits.

DSC

Ani-SDSC

OAR

Baseline Model

Updated Model

p

Baseline Model

Updated Model

p

HN

Bone_Mandible

0.88 ± 0.02

0.89 ± 0.02

0.01*

0.98 ± 0.02

0.98 ± 0.02

0.23

Cochlea_R

0.68 ± 0.11

0.71 ± 0.12

0.01*

0.99 ± 0.02

0.99 ± 0.04

0.56

Eye_R

0.92 ± 0.02

0.93 ± 0.02

0.02*

0.99 ± 0.02

0.98 ± 0.02

0.27

Glnd_Submand_L

0.75 ± 0.22

0.79 ± 0.17

0.70

0.94 ± 0.24

1.00 ± 0.00

0*

SpinalCord

0.85 ± 0.04

0.88 ± 0.04

0.01*

0.98 ± 0.05

0.98 ± 0.06

0.82

Pelvis

Femur_Head_L

0.90 ± 0.04

0.91 ± 0.03

0.37

0.94 ± 0.06

0.87 ± 0.04

0*

Femur_Head_R

0.91 ± 0.03

0.93 ± 0.02

0.01*

0.94 ± 0.06

0.87 ± 0.05

0*