Presenter(s)
F. Forghani1, T. R. Mazur1, J. P. Schiff2, D. Hong1, A. D'Souza3, R. Mueller1, J. Hamilton4, J. Harris4, T. Jamruk4, J. Hilliard5, R. Beckert1, A. K. Bhatt6, G. R. Vlacich1, C. G. Robinson1, P. Samson1, and E. Laugeman1; 1WashU Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO, 2Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 3Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 4Wash U Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 5Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 6Karmanos Cancer Institute at McLaren Greater Lansing, Lansing, MI
Lessons Learned from a Direct-to-Unit Single Fraction Lung SBRT Pilot Trial
Purpose/Objective(s):
Results: Eight of ten patients were successfully treated using the DTU workflow, meeting protocol-defined OAR and target coverage criteria. Two cases were converted to standard SBRT: one for excessive respiratory motion and one for atypical anatomy and setup variation from diagnostic imaging. Table 1 summarizes lessons learned from the trial, including cases converted to standard SBRT and cases that were successfully treated with ONE-STOP.
Table 1: Lessons learned & improved DTU guidelines.
| DTU Criterion | Lessons from Trial | Improved Guidelines |
| Patient Selection | Difficulty for patients maintaining treatment position | Restrict DTU to patients tolerating stable treatment position & similar setup to the diagnostic CT |
| Diagnostic CT Suitability | Scan incompatible with adaptive TPS format | Require high-quality CT (or PET/CT) compatible with adaptive interface Load offline plan on adaptive treatment delivery system before treatment day |
| Target Motion Characteristics | Complex target motion | PTV margins based on expected motion by location (Upper vs. Lower lobe) If available use PET signal blurring to estimate motion. |
| Treatment Setup | Scan initiation at treatment isocenter was difficult without initial setup marks | Standardize mark-free setup protocols with predefined anatomical landmarks (e.g. xiphoid process). |
| Planning Strategies | Atypical anatomy caused unacceptable adaptive plan | Use robust planning strategies & beam geometries accommodating change in arm position and anatomical shifts |