Main Session
Sep
28
SS 10 - Patient Reported Outcomes/QoL/Survivorship 1: Fixing What's Broken and Reaching for the Sky
160 - Long-Term Decision Regret among Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer: Results from a Population-Based Cohort
Presenter(s)

Rahul Mali, MD, MPH - University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
R. D. Mali1, A. Katz2, Y. Cao1, D. S. Usinger3, X. Shen1, and R. C. Chen1; 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 2Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 3University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Purpose/Objective(s):
Men with prostate cancer face a difficult decision when choosing among management options that differ in their potential effects on urinary, bowel and sexual function. We evaluated whether patients who experience treatment-related symptoms are more likely to have decision regret.Materials/Methods:
The North Carolina Prostate Cancer Comparative Effectiveness & Survivorship Study (NC ProCESS) enrolled patients across NC with newly diagnosed prostate cancer between 2011-2013. Patients were enrolled prior to treatment and followed prospectively. Decision regret was assessed annually using a validated measure. Bivariate and multivariable regression models were used to assess the association between decision regret through 5-years of follow-up with treatment-related urinary, sexual and bowel symptoms (assessed using the validated Prostate Cancer Symptoms Indices), while adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics.Results:
A total of 1257 participants were included; 23.5% black and 23.4% living in rural areas. Through 5 years of follow-up, 418 (33.3%) reported decision regret. On multivariable analysis, worsened urinary obstruction/irritation compared to baseline (p<.01), and worsened bowel symptoms (p<.01) were associated with increased likelihood of decision regret, and worsened urinary incontinence was of borderline significance (p=.06) (Table). Compared to radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy was associated with a lower likelihood of regret (p=.02) while active surveillance was associated with a greater likelihood (p<0.01) of regret.Conclusion:
Approximately 1 in 3 men with localized prostate cancer have decision regret within 5 years of follow-up. Treatment-related symptoms and treatment choice are significantly associated with regret. These results highlight the importance of informed decision-making for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Abstract 160 - Table 1: Multivariable analysis of patient characteristics associated with decision regret within 5 years of follow-upCharacteristic | Risk Ratio (95% CI) | p-value |
Worsened function compared to baseline | ||
Urinary incontinence | 1.18 (0.99, 1.41) | 0.06 |
Urinary obstruction/irritation | 1.26 (1.07, 1.49) | <.01 |
Bowel symptoms | 1.38 (1.17, 1.62) | <.01 |
Sexual dysfunction | 1.08 (0.91, 1.27) | 0.38 |
Treatment (vs Radical Prostatectomy) | ||
Active surveillance | 1.34 (1.11, 1.63) | <.01 |
Brachytherapy | 0.72 (0.50, 1.04) | 0.08 |
External beam radiation therapy | 0.75 (0.59, 0.95) | 0.02 |
Other | 1.12 (0.81, 1.55) | 0.48 |
Black (vs White) | 1.05 (0.88, 1.25) | 0.61 |
Married (vs not married) | 0.84 (0.70, 1.01) | 0.06 |
Education (vs = HS graduate) | ||
Some college | 0.77 (0.63, 0.93) | <.01 |
College graduate | 0.55 (0.45, 0.68) | <.01 |