277 - Feasibility, Safety and Patient Reported Early Clinical Outcomes of Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy of Unresectable Bulky Tumors Followed by SBRT Delivery
Presenter(s)
D. Pokhrel1, J. Misa1, J. A. Knight II2, W. St Clair1, and E. S. Yang1; 1University of Kentucky, Department of Radiation Medicine, Lexington, KY, 2University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Purpose/Objective(s): Highly heterogenous sieve-like dose distribution via spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) to large and bulky tumors (= 6 cm) could enhance tumor cells kill via both direct/indirect cell kill mechanisms. Adding highly conformal SBRT dose post-SFRT could further enhance therapeutic ratio, reduce tumor burden, and pain relief. We present our novel treatment scheme of SBRT to large and bulky unresectable tumors immediately post-SFRT.
Materials/Methods: Utilizing a same day image-guided MLC-based SFRT, we have treated 11 select extracranial patients with large and bulky unresectable tumors of different histology using single-dose of 15 Gy (6/10MV beam, AcurosXB algorithm). These patients also received highly conformal VMAT SBRT treatment (6MV-FFF, 30-35 Gy in 5 fractions) every other day, 2-3 days post-SFRT. Average SFRT tumor size (GTV) was 354.4 cc, maximum 871.2 cc. SBRT plans were generated for 5 mm planning target volume (PTV) margin around GTV, resulting large PTV: 683.5+/-434.8 (144.5–1361.0) cc. For more accurate dose assessment, a novel voxelized spatial biological effective dose (s-BED) method was developed that combines both treatments and provided a composite s-BED; a/ß = 10 Gy (tumor) and 3 Gy (normal tissues). Dose to organs-at-risk (OAR) was evaluated via spatial EQD2 script. Treatment delivery efficiency & accuracy was assessed. To assess tumor response, pain control, and radiation induced toxicity, patients underwent follow up exams and imaging study in 3-month intervals.
Results: The SFRT plans had average peak-to-valley-dose ratio = GTVD10%÷GTVD90%, GTV(V7.5Gy) and mean GTV dose were 3.0, 50.5%, and 7.8 Gy. For highly conformal SBRT plans (conformity index = 1.04+/-0.03), mean and maximum s-BED dose to PTV were 64.1+/-10.7 (52.4–92.5) Gy and 94.2+/-10.9 (79.8–119.7) Gy, enhancing target dose via SBRT. EQD2 maximum and 1 cc of skin doses were 61.9 Gy and 39.5 Gy; other adjacent OAR were spared: EQD2 maximum dose to spinal cord (14.6 Gy), esophagus (45.1 Gy), and small bowel (71.9 Gy). Independent Monte Carlo second check for both SFRT and SBRT plans agreed within ±3.0% of AcurosXB dose. Average patient-specific QA result was 97.8 % for 2%/2mm gamma criteria. Both SFRT and SBRT IGRT treatments were delivered in <15 min via 6DOF couch corrections. Sarcoma was the common treated histology, seen in 4 (40%) patients. Median follow-up was 3 months (range 3-9 months). One patient lost to follow up. Of the 10 patients assessed 5 (50%) demonstrated local tumor control on follow-up imaging, and 7 (70%) reported clinical pain relief. No patient reported grade 2+ toxicities.
Conclusion: Our novel and clinically useful SFRT plus SBRT scheme provided short course of rapid, safe, and effective treatment option for select patients with unresectable larger tumors including deep-seated bulky masses while adequately sparing adjacent OAR. Longer clinical follow up result with larger cohort is warranted. Adapting SBRT fractions for anatomical changes post-SFRT delivery is underway.