2122 - Multi-Omics Prediction of Radiosensitivity in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Machine Learning Radiogenomics Model
Presenter(s)
J. Lasington1, L. S. Mathew Lasington2, and S. Umamaheshwaran3; 1New York Medical College at St. Mary's and St. Clare's, Denville, NJ, 2Rutger's University, East Hanover, NJ, 3Personio, Manhattan, NY
Purpose/Objective(s): Radiotherapy (RT) outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) vary widely, with no validated genomic biomarkers to predict radiosensitivity or guide SBRT patient selection. We hypothesized that integrating somatic mutations, transcriptomic hypoxia signatures, and tumor mutational burden could predict RT response. We developed a machine learning radiogenomics model using TCGA multi-omics data.
Materials/Methods: We queried TCGA-PAAD (n=185) extracting clinical data, somatic mutations, RNA-seq (TPM), and copy number segments. Of 41 RT-treated patients, 26 had documented response (14 sensitive, 12 resistant). We engineered 19 features: somatic mutations (KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4, BRCA1/2, ATM), a composite hypoxia score from 10 genes (HIF1A, EPAS1, VEGFA, SLC2A1, LDHA, CA9, LOX, ADM, PGK1, BNIP3), log mutation burden, and clinical covariates. Gradient Boosting and Random Forest were trained using LOO-CV with class-balanced weighting. Feature importance was assessed by SHAP.
Results: Gradient Boosting achieved AUC 0.702 (accuracy 73%, sensitive precision 82%, resistant 67%); Random Forest AUC 0.607. SHAP identified the hypoxia score as the most impactful predictor, followed by log mutation burden, KRAS status, HIF1A, and SLC2A1. Higher hypoxia scores associated with radioresistance. KRAS-mutant tumors trended toward resistance. DNA repair mutations (BRCA1/2, ATM) had lower SHAP impact due to low mutation frequency.
Conclusion: A machine learning model integrating transcriptomic hypoxia signatures, somatic mutations, and mutational burden achieved meaningful discrimination (AUC 0.70) for PAAD radiosensitivity. The hypoxia score was the dominant predictor, reinforcing tumor hypoxia as a driver of radioresistance. These findings support developing radiogenomic biomarkers for SBRT patient selection in pancreatic cancer. Integration of computational pathology features from matched histopathology may further improve performance.
Model Performance, Classification Metrics, and SHAP Feature Importance (N=26)
GB - Gradient Boosting RF - Random Forest Sens - Number of sensitive patients Resist - Number of resistant patients Prec(S) - Precision for the sensitive class Prec(R) - Precision for the resistant class Hypoxia score - Composite z-score from 10 canonical hypoxia genes Log mut burden - Log-transformed total somatic mutation count HIF1A - Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 Alpha SLC2A1 - Solute Carrier Family 2 Member 1 KRAS - Kirsten Rat Sarcoma viral oncogene LOO-CV - Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation PAAD - Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma SBRT - Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy| Category | Metric | GB | RF | Sens | Resist | N | Prec(S) | Prec(R) | SHAP Rank |
| Performance | AUC | 0.702 | 0.607 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 0.82 | 0.67 | - |
|
| Accuracy | 73% | 65% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| SHAP Top 5 | Hypoxia score | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1st |
|
| Log mut burden | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2nd |
|
| KRAS mutation | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3rd |
|
| HIF1A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4th |
|
| SLC2A1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5th |
| Features | Hypoxia genes | 10 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | Dominant |
|
| Total features | 19 | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | - |