LBA 30 - Digital Pathology in Relation to Immune Activation Following Aglatimagene Besadenovec Immunotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer
Presenter(s)
F. Barone1, J. Dwyer1, A. Manzanera1, J. Buie1, M. Lee2, J. Leech2, M. Alderdice2, M. Garzotto3, G. Gejerman4, J. E. Sylvester5, R. Tutrone6, W. Nichols1, and P. P. Tak1; 1Candel Therapeutics, Inc., Needham, MA, 2Sonrai Analytics, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, 3Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 4New Jersey Urology - Saddle Brook, Saddle Brook, NJ, 5Atlantic Urology Clinics, Myrtle Beach, SC, 6Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD
Purpose/Objective(s):
Despite treatment with curative intent external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), approximately 30% of patients with localized, intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) experience recurrence. Aglatimagene besadenovec (aglatimagene) is a replication-defective adenoviral vector encoding the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-tk) gene. Preclinical and clinical data show that aglatimagene, in combination with valacyclovir, induces local and systemic antitumoral activity that is synergistic with radiation therapy. A pivotal placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial of evaluating aglatimagene + valacyclovir in combination with EBRT in 745 patients with intermediate- to high-risk, localized PCa showed significantly improvement in disease-free survival after aglatimagene treatment, independent of radiotherapy regimen (conventional vs moderate hypofractionated EBRT) and short-term use of androgen deprivation therapy. We present histologic analyses of prostate biopsies assessing the biological effect of aglatimagene plus EBRT compared to EBRT alone1.Materials/Methods:
We used digitized hematoxylin and eosin-stained prostate biopsy samples collected at baseline and after treatment with either aglatimagene or placebo (n=647). We applied machine learning models, trained on balanced pre- and post-radiation datasets, annotated by expert pathologists to identify and quantify immune infiltration in prostate biopsy samples. We then performed spatial analysis of paired pre- and post-treatment biopsies to quantify lymphocytes and their proximity to tumor regions.Results:
Across all collected biopsies, overall lymphocytic fraction increased in post-treatment samples in both arms (p<0.001), with a significantly greater increase in the aglatimagene arm versus EBRT alone (p=0.048). To define treatment-associated changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) among patients with detectable disease, we analyzed paired pre- and post-treatment biopsies from patients with available tumor-positive post-treatment biopsies (62 aglatimagene, 46 EBRT alone). In this subset, aglatimagene significantly increased intratumoral lymphocyte fraction (p<0.001) and maintained lymphocyte/tumor interaction relative to EBRT alone, as demonstrated by enrichment in lymphocyte-tumor mixing score and lymphocyte/tumor neighborhood (p<0.001 for both).Conclusion:
These findings show that adding aglatimagene to standard-of-care EBRT increases intratumoral lymphocyte infiltration and remodels the TME beyond EBRT alone. This immune signature, detected even in tumor-positive biopsies, supports the hypothesis that aglatimagene contributes to local tumor control through sustained immune surveillance and continued lymphocyte engagement with tumor cells. 1) DeWeese et al. Lancet Oncology. 2026;27:673-685.