Main Session
Sep 29
PQA 06 - Genitourinary Cancer, Gynecological Cancer, and Health Care Access and Engagement

3277 - Interfractional Dosimetric Variations During MR-guided Radiotherapy as Predictors of Genitourinary Toxicity in Prostate Cancer

02:15pm - 03:30pm ET
Poster Hall - Exhibit Hall A
Screen: 10
POSTER

Presenter(s)

Jessica Hossa, MD, MS, BS Headshot
Jessica Hossa, MD, MS, BS - Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA

J. A. Hossa1, C. S. Shah2, and P. B. Renz2; 1Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, 2Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA

Purpose/Objective(s):

To assess the association of dosimetric parameters with physician and patient-reported genitourinary (GU) toxicity for prostate cancer patients undergoing MR-guided Radiotherapy (MRgRT).

Materials/Methods:

This retrospective study included patients (=18 years) with biopsy-proven prostate adenocarcinoma and no prior prostate radiation or prostatectomy who received curative intent MRgRT at a single institution. Interfractional dosimetric changes were assessed using the difference in PTV receiving 95% of prescribed dose between the 5th and 1st treatment fractions (? V95PTV 5-1 fx).

Results:

A total of 89 patients met inclusion criteria and were treated between 2021-2025 The mean age of the cohort was 69.9 ± 5.5 years, and mean baseline prostate size was 43.7 ± 19.5 cc. Overall, with respect to GU toxicity, 20% (n=18) had acute grade 2, 4% (n=4) had late grade 2, and 2% (n=2) had late grade 3 events. With respect to gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, 9% (n=8) had acute grade 1 or 2 events, 1% (n=1) had acute grade 3 events, and 1% (n=1) had late grade 3 events. Higher GU toxicity grade was associated with GI toxicity (p =0.008). With regards to factors associated with GU toxicity, a significant difference was observed in the ? V95PTV 5-1 fx across GU toxicity grades (p=0.002). Grade 2 toxicity was associated with a greater mean volume change from their last to first fraction vs. those with no toxicity (Grade 0) (6.03 ± 10.65 cm3 vs. 1.35 ± 6.23 cm3, p < .001). ? V95PTV 5-1 fx was identified as a significant independent risk factor of GU toxicity grade (p < .001) when controlling for the use of ADT, prior GU condition, Gleason score, and Dmax of the bladder. Each 1 cm3 increase in V95PTV at the 5th fraction relative to the 1st fraction was associated with a 20% increase in the odds of experiencing a higher grade of GU toxicity (OR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.08–1.33).

Conclusion:

Increase of ? V95PTV 5-1 fx was associated with a 20% increase in the risk of higher GU toxicity grade, demonstrating the importance of monitoring interfractional volumetric changes throughout adaptive MRgRT treatment.

Table 1. Predictors of GU toxicity grade

*Indicates a significance of a = 0.05
Variable Coefficient (ß) Std. Error Wald Odds Ratio (eß) 95% CI for OR p-value
? V95PTV 5th fx – 1st fx* 0.184 0.053 11.962 1.2 [1.08, 1.33] <0.001 *
? Dmax bladder 5th fx – 1st fx 0.003 0.003 1.076 1 [0.99, 1.01] 0.3
Prior GU condition 0.661 0.522 1.605 1.94 [0.70, 5.39] 0.205
Use of ADT -0.921 0.545 2.851 0.4 [0.14, 1.16] 0.091
Gleason Score 6.0* 3.537 1.57 5.076 34.36 [1.58, 745.5] 0.024*
Gleason Score 7.0 1.827 1.236 2.185 6.22 [0.55, 69.9] 0.139
Gleason Score 8.0 -0.801 1.762 0.207 0.45 [0.01, 14.1] 0.649