Main Session
Sep 30
PQA 07 - Genitourinary Cancer, Patient Safety, Nursing/Supportive Care

3249 - Predicting Response to <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 Using Pre-Treatment Clinical Biomarkers

12:45pm - 02:00pm PT
Hall F
Screen: 33
POSTER

Presenter(s)

Jackson Howell, MD Headshot
Jackson Howell, MD - University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT

J. Howell1, J. Wilkes2, N. M. Maughan2, K. Morton3, E. Hu4, D. Gill5, S. Samuelson6, S. B. Johnson1,7, and D. Boothe2,6; 1Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Intermountain Health, Murray, UT, 3Dept. of Radiology, Intermountain Health, Murray, UT, 4Intermountain Health & Summit Physician Specialists, Murray, UT, 5Dept. of Medical Oncology, Intermountain Health, Murray, UT, 6Utah Cancer Specialists, Murray, UT, 7Dept. of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Purpose/Objective(s):

Lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen 617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) is a beta-emitting radioligand therapy used in the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Post-treatment factors such as early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reductions predict response; however, predictive models using pre-treatment biomarkers are lacking and present a significant challenge to patient selection. We hypothesize that local progression after prior radiation (RT) (indicative of radioresistance) and pre-treatment PSMA PET/CT characteristics can be used to predict 177Lu-PSMA-617 response.

Materials/Methods:

Pre-treatment clinical and imaging characteristics (demographics, mean disease standard uptake value [SUV] on PSMA PET/CT, max SUV, lesional heterogeneity), pre-cycle labs, prior treatments (RT, surgery, systemic therapy), and treatment responses were retrospectively collected for a cohort of 59 mCRPC patients who had previously received RT and were treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 at two community centers. PSA response was dichotomized between those who did and did not achieve a =50% reduction in PSA after cycle 2 (PSA50-2) of 177Lu-PSMA-617, and this variable’s correlations with pre-treatment characteristics were analyzed using univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) logistic regression analysis. Progression-free survival ([PFS], radiographic progression or persistent PSA elevation) was analyzed using log-rank and Kaplan-Meier methods.

Results:

Median follow-up was 10.9 months (mo), and median PFS was 6.5 mo (95%CI [4.1 – 10.3]). Twenty patients (33.9%) were determined to have had local failure after RT, 38 (64.4%) had a mean disease SUV < 10, and 30 (50.8%) ultimately achieved PSA50-2 on 177Lu-PSMA-617. When evaluating pre-treatment clinical factors, both local failure after RT (UVA: HR 3.7, P=.025; MVA: HR 5.2, P=.024) and mean disease SUV < 10 (UVA: HR 9.6, P=.002; MVA: HR 12.5, P=.002) were independent, negative predictors of PSA50-2. Among patients with both local failure after RT and a mean disease SUV < 10, only 14.3% achieved PSA50-2, compared to 50.0% and 91.7% among those who had one or neither risk factor, respectively. On logistic regression analysis, patients with one or both risk factors were at heightened risk of not achieving PSA50-2 (0 factors: reference; 1 factor: HR 11.0, P=.030; 2 factors: HR 66.0, P=.001), and the three groups demonstrated stratification of PFS outcomes (0 factors: median PFS 14.1 mo, reference; 1 factor: median PFS 5.1 mo, P=.002; 2 factors: median PFS 3.9 mo, P<.001).

Conclusion:

Local failure after RT and mean disease SUV < 10 on PSMA PET/CT are clinically relevant pre-treatment biomarkers that can be used combinatorially to predict response to 177Lu-PSMA-617. Our model could help optimize patient selection and enhance prognostication. Validation in a larger, prospective cohort is warranted.