Main Session
Sep 30
PQA 07 - Genitourinary Cancer, Patient Safety, Nursing/Supportive Care

3310 - Predictive Value of Pre- and Post-Treatment Tumor Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Definitive Radiotherapy: Long-Term Analysis from a Single-Institution Study

12:45pm - 02:00pm PT
Hall F
Screen: 20
POSTER

Presenter(s)

Huseyin Cem Onal, MD Headshot
Huseyin Cem Onal, MD - Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Yuregir

H. C. Onal1,2, G. Erbay3, B. Demirhan4, A. Elmali1, and O. C. C. Guler2; 1Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey, 2Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Adana, Turkey, 3Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Department of Radiology, Adana, Turkey, 4Iskenderun Gelisim Hospital, Hatay, Turkey

Purpose/Objective(s):

This study aimed to evaluate whether quantitative multiparametric MRI, performed before and after treatment, can predict biochemical outcomes and survival in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving definitive radiotherapy (RT).

Materials/Methods:

The records of 186 high-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent definitive RT between September 2010 and January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria included a minimum follow-up of 24 months, at least 12 months of ADT, and treatment with pelvic RT plus prostate RT of at least 78 Gy. A radiologist delineated the index lesion and normal prostate tissue, measuring apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. The primary endpoints were biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent predictors.

Results:

Post-treatment diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI), performed at a median of 4.1 months after RT, showed a significant increase in tumor ADC values (0.712 ± 0.140 vs. 1.002 ± 0.189 × 10?³ mm²/s; p < 0.001) with no significant change in normal prostate tissue (p = 0.44). The median follow-up was 10.7 years (IQR: 9.8–11.5 years). The 8-year bDFS and PCSS rates were 86.1% and 87.1%, respectively. Patients with disease progression had significantly lower post-treatment ADC values (0.876 ± 0.174 vs. 1.029 ± 0.181 × 10?³ mm²/s; p < 0.001), whereas pre-treatment ADC values were not predictive. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed post-treatment ADC values had significant predictive value (AUC = 0.724, p < 0.001 for progression; AUC = 0.696, p = 0.001 for prostate cancer mortality). A post-treatment ADC cutoff of 0.939 × 10?³ mm²/s was identified for predicting disease progression and mortality. Univariate analysis identified ISUP grade, treatment with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), ADT duration, and post-treatment ADC values as significant prognostic factors for bDFS and PCSS. Serum PSA levels were also predictive of bDFS. Patients with lower post-treatment ADC values (<0.939 × 10?³ mm²/s) had significantly worse 8-year bDFS (75.2% vs. 93.8%; p = 0.003) and PCSS (79.8% vs. 92.5%; p = 0.03). In multivariable analysis, higher PSA levels (=20 ng/mL), ISUP grade 4–5, and shorter ADT duration (=18 months) were independent predictors of worse bDFS and PCSS. Post-treatment ADC value was an additional independent predictor for worse bDFS.

Conclusion:

Post-treatment tumor ADC values were significantly associated with bDFS and PCSS in high-risk prostate cancer patients, whereas pre-treatment ADC values had no prognostic significance. Lower post-treatment ADC values correlated with worse outcomes, highlighting their potential role as an imaging biomarker for risk stratification and treatment optimization.