Main Session
Sep 30
PQA 07 - Genitourinary Cancer, Patient Safety, Nursing/Supportive Care

3265 - Urethra-Sparing Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: Current Practices and Future Insights from an International Survey

12:45pm - 02:00pm PT
Hall F
Screen: 16
POSTER

Presenter(s)

Jennifer Le Guevelou, MD - Laboratoire du traitement de l'image et du signal, université de Rennes, Rennes, France

J. Le Guevelou1, P. Sargos2, P. Ost3, F. Alongi4, S. Arcangeli5, A. Berlin6, P. Blanchard7, A. Bruynzeel8, O. Chapet9, A. Dal Pra10, R. T. Dess11, M. Guckenberger12, D. A. Loblaw13, A. U. Kishan14, B. A. Jereczek-Fossa15, D. Pasquier16, M. Shelan17, S. Siva18, A. Tree19, C. Zamboglou20, S. Supiot21, V. Murthy22, and T. Zilli23; 1Laboratoire du traitement de l'image et du signal, université de Rennes, Rennes, France, 2CRLCC Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, Aquitaine, France, 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium, 4Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology, IRCSS "Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital" Cancer Care Center, Negrar di Valpolicella (VR), Italy, 5University of Milan Bicocca - School of Medicine and Surgery, Milan, Italy, 6Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 7Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, 8Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 9Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France, 10Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, 11Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 12Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 13Ontario Institute of cancer research, Toronto, ON, Canada, 14Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 15European Institute of Oncology, MILAN, Italy, 16Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France, 17bern university hospital, bern, Switzerland, 18Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 19The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer research, London, United Kingdom, 20German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus, 21Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France, 22Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India, 23IOSI - Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland

Purpose/Objective(s): In prostate cancer patients, high radiation doses to the urethra have been associated with an increased risk of severe genitourinary toxicity following dose-escalated radiotherapy. Urethra-sparing techniques have emerged as a promising approach to reduce urinary toxicity. This international survey aims to evaluate current global practices in urethra-sparing and explore future directions for the implementation of this technique in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer.

Materials/Methods: In April 2024, a survey consisting of 20 questions was distributed to 26 international radiation oncology experts in prostate cancer EBRT, with 23 experts participating. The survey focused on clinical scenarios which might take benefit from urethra-sparing, the definition of the urethra and urinary organs-at-risk, and urethral dose constraints.

Results: Magnetic resonance imaging with T2-weighted sequences is the preferred method for urethra contouring (83 % consensus). Based on the experts opinion, urethra-sparing should be considered for prostate cancer EBRT, regardless of pelvic irradiation, except in cases where the tumor is located within 2 mm of the urethra and/or transitional zone, or in T4 disease. Most experts would not apply specific dose constraints to the urethra for either conventional or moderate hypofractionation regimens. When delivering stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), urethra-sparing with dose hotspot limitation (urethra steering) is recommended by 70 % of the experts, in particular when combined with focal boosting (91 %). Urethra dose-reduction is also the favored approach for salvage prostate reirradiation with SBRT (70 % agreement). Large variations exists regarding urethral dose constraints.

Conclusion: Urethra-sparing is a promising technique for the mitigation of urinary toxicity in prostate cancer patients undergoing EBRT, particularly recommended for ultra-hypofractionation and reirradiation with SBRT. The lack of consensus on specific urethral dose constraints and optimal sparing techniques underscores the need for further research to standardize practices in this field.