Main Session
Sep 29
PQA 07 - Head and Neck Cancer, Lung Cancer/Thoracic Malignancies, and Nursing and Supportive Care

3594 - Immunonutrition for Prevention of Radiotherapy-Induced Severe Oral Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer: Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

03:45pm - 05:00pm ET
Poster Hall - Exhibit Hall A
Screen: 11
POSTER

Presenter(s)

Qiao Qiao, MD, PhD, BS, BSN Headshot
Qiao Qiao, MD, PhD, BS, BSN - The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning

Q. Qiao, Y. Sun, M. Gong, and W. Ye; the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China

Purpose/Objective(s):

Severe oral mucositis (SOM) remains a frequent toxicity of radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer, often resulting in treatment interruption, increased supportive care use, and higher health care costs. Evidence regarding the value of immunonutrition as a preventive strategy remains limited.

Materials/Methods:

This prospective, randomized, phase II trial enrolled 80 patients with head and neck malignancies undergoing definitive radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive immunonutrition plus standard care (n=43) or standard care with routine nutritional counseling alone(n=37). Immunonutrition was administered daily from the start of radiotherapy to 1 month after completion. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade =3 oral mucositis. Secondary endpoints included time to onset and duration of SOM, radiotherapy interruption, nutritional and health-related quality of life measured by EQ-5D. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the health care system perspective, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated.

Results: Grade =3 oral mucositis occurred in 32.6% of patients in the immunonutrition group compared with 64.9% in the control group (P=0.004). Immunonutrition delayed the onset(NE vs. 29,P=0.002)and reduced the duration of SOM(8.70±16.032 vs. 29.08±26.711,P<0.001) and was associated with non-significant but fewer radiotherapy interruptions(14.0% vs.32.4%,P=0.088). Patients receiving immunonutrition demonstrated improved preservation of weight(-2.70±4.05 vs. -7.26±7.95,P=0.011) and lower inflammatory burden(IL-6,28 days during radiotherapy,10.800±11.657 vs. 17.304±21.828,P=0.035). Although immunonutrition increased direct intervention costs, reductions in SOM-related management costs and gains in health utility resulted in a favorable ICER that was below the predefined willingness-to-pay threshold(Three times the per capita GDP of China in 2024,3×13445 USD).

Conclusion: In patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy, immunonutrition reduced the incidence of severe oral mucositis and improved treatment tolerance. From a value-based perspective, immunonutrition provided additional health benefits at an acceptable incremental cost, supporting its role as a supportive care intervention during radiotherapy.

Treatment Control P
Per-patient cost,Mean(SD),USD Costs Associated with Unplanned Admissions 329.26(809.87) 409.09(749.13) 0.074
Treatment Costs for Oral Mucositis 43.31(100.86)

49.45(84.98)

0.103

Cost of Drug Therapy 705.14(358.29)

0

<0.001

Total 1077.7(815.8)

458.55(743.77)

<0.001

Per patient incremental cost,USD

619.15

Per patient QALY(Mean/SD)

0.1772(0.0209)

0.1539(0.0271)

<0.001

Per patient incremental QALY

0.0233

ICER(USD/QALY)

26573.12