Main Session
Sep 28
QP 13 - Pixels to Plans: AI-Driven Contouring and Imaging Innovation

1075 - Auto-Segmented Organ-at-Risk Volume Variability as a Patient-Specific Predictive Biomarker for Gastrointestinal Toxicity Risk Stratification in Abdominal Radiotherapy

03:20pm - 03:25pm ET
Room 162

Presenter(s)

Jeril Lasington, MD, MS, MBBS - New York Medical College at St.Mary's and St. Clare's, Denville, NJ

J. Lasington1, L. S. Mathew Lasington2, S. Umamaheshwaran3, and C. D. Dirican4; 1New York Medical College at St. Mary's and St. Clare's, Denville, NJ, 2Rutger's University, East Hanover, NJ, 3Personio, Manhattan, NY, 4New York Medical College at St.Mary's and St. Clare's, Denville, NJ

Purpose/Objective(s): Inter-fraction anatomical variability of GI organs-at-risk (OARs) is well-recognized but poorly quantified at patient level. Current practice applies uniform margins regardless of individual variability. We hypothesized that inter-fraction OAR volume variability, quantified via deep learning auto-segmentation across longitudinal imaging, could serve as a patient-specific biomarker for GI toxicity risk, enabling individualized margin adaptation.

Materials/Methods: The UW-Madison GI Tract dataset (96 patients, serial abdominal CTs across multiple fractions) was analyzed. A U-Net with EfficientNet-B3 encoder was trained on 38,964 annotated slices to auto-segment stomach, small bowel, and large bowel (mean Dice: 0.928). Per-organ volumes were computed per patient-fraction using predicted segmentations with patient-specific pixel spacing and 3mm slice thickness. Inter-fraction variability was quantified by coefficient of variation (CV%), volume range, and maximum inter-fraction delta. Patients were stratified into tertile-based risk groups (Low/Medium/High) using composite CV. Predictive performance was assessed via 5-fold cross-validated logistic regression with ROC analysis. Patient-specific PTV margins were derived using an adapted van Herk formula (M=2.5S+0.7s). Statistical comparisons used Kruskal-Wallis tests with post-hoc Mann-Whitney U and Spearman correlations.

Results: Substantial inter-fraction volume variability was observed: stomach CV 20.2±14.2%, small bowel 21.4±15.4%, large bowel 21.7±14.4%. Risk stratification showed significant separation (KW p<10?6; Cohen's d: 1.37-2.14). High-risk patients demonstrated 32.3% mean CV vs 11.4% for low-risk. Cross-validated ROC analysis: composite AUC=0.995±0.006; individual organ AUCs 0.807-0.857. Small bowel CV was the strongest predictor (LR coefficient=2.27). Adaptive margins showed 52-78% reductions for low-variability patients vs uniform worst-case (e.g., stomach: 4.9 vs 21.7mm).

Conclusion: Inter-fraction OAR volume variability quantified through auto-segmentation is a robust patient-specific biomarker for GI toxicity risk stratification. High-variability patients may benefit from adaptive replanning, while low-variability patients can safely receive reduced margins. This framework provides a clinically actionable trigger for individualized adaptive RT and warrants prospective validation with toxicity outcomes.

Volume Variability Metrics, Risk Stratification, Predictive Performance, and Adaptive Margins

Category

Metric

Stomach

Small Bowel

Large Bowel

Low

Medium

High

AUC

p-value

Volume

Mean (cc)

283±103

525±207

515±262

-

-

-

-

-

Variability

CV (%)

20.2±14.2

21.4±15.4

21.7±14.4

11.4

19.7

32.3

-

<10?6

Max ? (cc)

148±142

229±143

210±141

-

-

-

-

-

Prediction

Organ AUC

0.835

0.857

0.807

-

-

-

0.995

-

LR Coeff

1.42

2.27

1.71

-

-

-

-

-

Margins

S (mm)

-

-

-

1.5

4.5

6.6

-

-

(Stomach)

M (mm)

-

-

-

4.9

14.8

21.7

-

-

Margins

M (mm)

-

-

-

10.1

14.4

25.3

-

-

(Sm Bowel)

Reduction

-

-

-

60%

-

ref

-

-